Corey Dewayne Wilbert v. State
This text of Corey Dewayne Wilbert v. State (Corey Dewayne Wilbert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-19-00036-CR
COREY DEWAYNE WILBERT, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 76th District Court Camp County, Texas Trial Court No. CF-17-01787
Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDER
Corey Dewayne Wilbert has filed an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered by the
76th Judicial District Court of Camp County. Wilbert retained Clay Dean Thomas to represent
him on appeal, but Thomas has filed a motion to withdraw with this Court averring that Wilbert
no longer desires his services. Thomas’ motion satisfied the requirements of Rule 6.5 of the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure, and we hereby grant the motion to withdraw. See TEX. R. APP. P.
6.5.
In light of these circumstances, we abate this case to the trial court so that it may conduct
whatever hearings are necessary to make the following determinations: (1) whether Wilbert still
desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, (2) whether Wilbert is indigent and entitled to the
appointment of counsel to represent him on appeal. If Wilbert is determined to be indigent, then
the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him on appeal.
The trial court may enter any orders necessary to implement these directives. Any hearing
shall be conducted by the trial court within fifteen days of the date of this order. Appropriate
orders and findings shall be sent to this Court in the form of a supplemental clerk’s record within
ten days of the date of the hearing contemplated by this order. The reporter’ record of any hearing
shall be filed with this Court within ten days of the date of the hearing contemplated by this order.
All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of the supplemental
appellate record.
2 IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: March 20, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Corey Dewayne Wilbert v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corey-dewayne-wilbert-v-state-texapp-2019.