Corey Dain Armstrong v. the State of Texas
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00368-CR
COREY DAIN ARMSTRONG, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 108th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 083994-E-CR, Honorable Douglas R. Woodburn, Presiding
August 22, 2025 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Corey Dain Armstrong, appeals his conviction for online solicitation of a
minor1 and sentence to three years of confinement. We previously remanded this cause
to the trial court to determine whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal.
While on remand, Appellant filed a motion in this Court seeking to voluntarily dismiss the
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §33.021(b). appeal. The motion to dismiss is signed by both Appellant and his attorney. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.2(a).
As no decision of the Court has been delivered, we reinstate the appeal and grant
the motion. The appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our
mandate will issue forthwith.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corey Dain Armstrong v. the State of Texas (Corey Dain Armstrong v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.