Corey Dain Armstrong v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 22, 2025·No. 07-24-00368-CR·Published

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-24-00368-CR

COREY DAIN ARMSTRONG, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 108th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 083994-E-CR, Honorable Douglas R. Woodburn, Presiding

August 22, 2025 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.

Appellant, Corey Dain Armstrong, appeals his conviction for online solicitation of a

minor1 and sentence to three years of confinement. We previously remanded this cause

to the trial court to determine whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal.

While on remand, Appellant filed a motion in this Court seeking to voluntarily dismiss the

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §33.021(b). appeal. The motion to dismiss is signed by both Appellant and his attorney. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.2(a).

As no decision of the Court has been delivered, we reinstate the appeal and grant

the motion. The appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our

mandate will issue forthwith.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corey Dain Armstrong v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Corey Dain Armstrong v. the State of Texas (Corey Dain Armstrong v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 33.021
Texas PE § 33.021(b)