Corey Chandler v. State
This text of Corey Chandler v. State (Corey Chandler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-19-00487-CR
Corey Chandler, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-DC-18-904055, THE HONORABLE P. DAVID WAHLBERG, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T
PER CURIAM
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by
a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he
provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine
the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for
pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with
this Court.
Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial
court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was
provided, on or before April 20, 2020. See id. at 321.
It is ordered on April 10, 2020.
Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Corey Chandler v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corey-chandler-v-state-texapp-2020.