Corey Askew v. Cropsey
This text of 416 F. App'x 565 (Corey Askew v. Cropsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Corey A. Askew appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendants Sergeant Daniel Cropsey and Lieutenant Jeremy Bush and dismissing his state-law claims. After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, this court determines that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion. Rather, we adopt the reasoning of the district court (and the magistrate judge in those instances where the district court did so) on those issues raised in this appeal and affirm the district court’s judgment. 1 To the extent that Askew argues issues not raised in the district court, we deem those arguments forfeited. See Dealer Computer Servs., Inc. v. Dub Herring Ford, 623 F.3d 348, 357 (6th Cir.2010).
. We recognize that Askew did claim that the defendants knew the exhaust fan would malfunction, despite the district court's statement to the contrary. We nevertheless find the district court's resolution of Askew's claims persuasive.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
416 F. App'x 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corey-askew-v-cropsey-ca6-2011.