Core v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Core v. State

949 N.E.2d 43, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1556

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 22, 2011

Docket2011-0586

StatusPublished

This text of 949 N.E.2d 43 (Core v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Core v. State, 949 N.E.2d 43, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1556 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 09AP-192,191 Ohio App.3d 651, 2010-Ohio-6292. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decision in 2009-0088, State v. Williams, Warren App. No. CA2008-02-029, 2008-Ohio-6195; and briefing schedule stayed.

Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I and hold the cause for the decision in 2010-1660, State v. Palmer, Franklin App. Nos. 09AP-956 and 09AP-957, 2010-Ohio-2421.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 09AP-192,191 Ohio App.3d 651, 2010-Ohio-6292. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decision in 2009-0088, State v. Williams, Warren App. No. CA2008-02-029, 2008-Ohio-6195; and briefing schedule stayed.

Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I and hold the cause for the decision in 2010-1660, State v. Palmer, Franklin App. Nos. 09AP-956 and 09AP-957, 2010-Ohio-2421.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

949 N.E.2d 43, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/core-v-state-ohio-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack