Core v. State
949 N.E.2d 43, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1556
Opinion
Franklin App. No. 09AP-192,191 Ohio App.3d 651, 2010-Ohio-6292. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decision in 2009-0088, State v. Williams, Warren App. No. CA2008-02-029, 2008-Ohio-6195; and briefing schedule stayed.
Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I and hold the cause for the decision in 2010-1660, State v. Palmer, Franklin App. Nos. 09AP-956 and 09AP-957, 2010-Ohio-2421.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Core v. State, 949 N.E.2d 43, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1556 (Ohio 2011).
949 N.E.2d 43 (Core v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Williams, Ca2008-02-029 (12-1-2008)
2008 Ohio 6195 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
Core v. State
947 N.E.2d 250 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2010)