Core Focus Consulting 2, LLC v. RenewAge Energy Solutions, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California·Decided February 28, 2025·No. 2:24-cv-01809·Unknown

Opinion

1 Amjad M. Khan (SBN 237325) amjad@bnsklaw.com 11601 Wilshire Blvd #2080 3 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Tel: (310) 593-9890 4 Thomas C. Rickeman (SBN 288248) 5 tom@bnsklaw.com BROWN, NERI, SMITH & KHAN LLP 6 650 Town Center Dr., #520 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 7 Tel: (949) 676-0030) 8 Attorneys for Defendant RENEWAGE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC. 9 12 13 CORE FOCUS CONSULTING 2, LLC, Case No. 2:24-cv-01809-CV-RAO 14 Plaintiff, District Judge: Hon. Cynthia Valenzuela 15 v. Magistrate Judge: Hon. Rozella A. Oliver 16 R INE CN .,EWAGE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, S OT RI DP EU RLATED PROTECTIVE 17 Defendant. 18 Action Filed: March 6, 2024 Trial Date: October 28, 2025 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Plaintiff Core Focus Consulting 2, LLC and Defendant RenewAge Energy 2 Solutions, Inc. hereby stipulate to the following protective order: 4 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 5 proprietary, and/or private information for which special protection from public 6 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 7 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 8 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 9 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 10 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 11 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 12 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth 13 in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to 14 file confidential information under seal; the parties must follow the applicable local 15 rules, including the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be 16 applied when a party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. 18 This action involves alleged confidential, financial, technical and/or 19 proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and 20 from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such 21 confidential and proprietary materials and information may consist of, among other 22 things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding 23 confidential business practices, or other confidential research, development, or 24 commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of third 25 parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be 26 privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, 27 court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of 1 discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep 2 confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of 3 such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling 4 at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such 5 information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information 6 will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so 7 designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, 8 non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public 9 record of this case. 11 2.1 Action: Core Focus Consulting 2, LLC v. RenewAge Energy Solutions, 12 Inc., Case No. 2:24-cv-01809-CV-RAO. 13 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 14 designation of information or items under this Order. 15 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 16 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify 17 for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as 18 specified above in the Good Cause Statement, including, but not 19 limited to, information contained or disclosed in any materials, 20 including documents, portions of documents, answers to 21 interrogatories, responses to requests for admissions, trial testimony, 22 deposition testimony, and transcripts of trial testimony and depositions, 23 including data, summaries, and compilations derived therefrom that is 24 deemed to be confidential information by any party to which it belongs. 25 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 26 their support staff). 27 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 1 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 2 EYES ONLY.” 3 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 4 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained 5 (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible 6 things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 7 discovery in this matter. 8 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 9 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its 10 counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 11 2.8 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information or 12 items (regardless of how generated, stored or maintained) or tangible 13 things that contain or reflect sensitive Confidential Information that the 14 designating party contends are trade secrets and/or commercially 15 sensitive, the disclosure of which could cause harm that could not be 16 avoided absent such designation. 17 2.9 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 18 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any 19 other outside counsel. 20 2.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 21 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 22 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 23 party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this 24 Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are 25 affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, 26 and includes support staff. 27 2.12 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 1 Record (and their support staffs). 2 2.13 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 3 Discovery Material in this Action. 4 2.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation 5 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing 6 exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in 7 any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 8 2.15 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 9 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 10 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 11 2.16 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 12 Material from a Producing Party. 14 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 15 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 16 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 17 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 18 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 20 Once a case proceeds to trial, information that was designated as 21 CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL or maintained pursuant to this 22 protective order used or introduced as an exhibit at trial becomes public and will be 23 presumptively available to all members of the public, including the press, unless 24 compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are 25 made to the trial judge in advance of the trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Core Focus Consulting 2, LLC v. RenewAge Energy Solutions, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2025).

Core Focus Consulting 2, LLC v. RenewAge Energy Solutions, Inc. (Core Focus Consulting 2, LLC v. RenewAge Energy Solutions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)