Cordua v. Guggenheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cordua v. Guggenheim

248 A.D. 771

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 771 (Cordua v. Guggenheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cordua v. Guggenheim, 248 A.D. 771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

In this action asking relief in the form of a declaratory judgment decreeing that the plaintiffs have an easement or right of way over property of one of the defendants to Long Island Sound, and asking further that the defendants be restrained from interfering therewith, judgment dismissing the complaint was, on motion, granted under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this action asking relief in the form of a declaratory judgment decreeing that the plaintiffs have an easement or right of way over property of one of the defendants to Long Island Sound, and asking further that the defendants be restrained from interfering therewith, judgment dismissing the complaint was, on motion, granted under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cordua-v-guggenheim-nyappdiv-1936.