Cordua v. Guggenheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cordua v. Guggenheim

248 A.D. 771

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

In this action asking relief in the form of a declaratory judgment decreeing that the plaintiffs have an easement or right of way over property of one of the defendants to Long Island Sound, and asking further that the defendants be restrained from interfering therewith, judgment dismissing the complaint was, on motion, granted under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this action asking relief in the form of a declaratory judgment decreeing that the plaintiffs have an easement or right of way over property of one of the defendants to Long Island Sound, and asking further that the defendants be restrained from interfering therewith, judgment dismissing the complaint was, on motion, granted under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cordua v. Guggenheim, 248 A.D. 771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 771 (Cordua v. Guggenheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.