Cordray v. Barnes

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Cordray v. Barnes

37 S.C.L. 281

DecidedJuly 1, 1832

StatusPublished

This text of 37 S.C.L. 281 (Cordray v. Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cordray v. Barnes, 37 S.C.L. 281 (S.C. Ct. App. 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

Curia, per

Johnson, J.

The Act of the Legislature, regulating appeals from the circuit court, authorizes the party prevailing therein, to enter up his judgment, and the execution, only, is suspended by the appeal — and that judgment has always been regarded as final, unless set aside or reversed. The case of the Ordinary vs. Trail, (2 Bail. 480) referred to in the report, is decisive of this.

O’Neall, J. concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia, per

Johnson, J.

The Act of the Legislature, regulating appeals from the circuit court, authorizes the party prevailing therein, to enter up his judgment, and the execution, only, is suspended by the appeal — and that judgment has always been regarded as final, unless set aside or reversed. The case of the Ordinary vs. Trail, (2 Bail. 480) referred to in the report, is decisive of this.

O’Neall, J. concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 S.C.L. 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cordray-v-barnes-scctapp-1832.