Cordova v. Kiage

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedJanuary 22, 2024
DocketN22C-04-086 MMJ
StatusPublished

This text of Cordova v. Kiage (Cordova v. Kiage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cordova v. Kiage, (Del. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

TORI LYNN CORDOVA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) C.A. No. N22C-04-086 MMJ ) JOEL MAEGO KIAGE and EMMA ) LOGISTICS, LLC, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER

Submitted: January 12, 2024 Decided: January 22, 2024

On Prime Insurance Company’s Application for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal

DENIED

1. On December 18, 2023, the Court denied Prime Insurance Company’s Motion

to Intervene.

2. On January 2, 2024, Prime filed an Application for Certification of

Interlocutory Appeal.

3. Supreme Court Rule 42(c)(i) provides that an application for certification of

interlocutory appeal “shall be served and filed within 10 days of the entry of the

order from which the appeal is sought, or such longer time as the trial court, in its

discretion, may order for good cause shown.” 4. Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Application for Certification of Interlocutory

Appeal of Prime Insurance Company was filed on January 12, 2024.

5. Rule 42(a) provides: “All time periods under this rule should be calculated

under Supreme Court Rule 11.”

6. Supreme Court Rule 11 states: “When the period of time prescribed or allowed

is less than 7 days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and other legal holidays shall

be excluded in the computation.” The relevant period of time for filing an

application is 10 days. Therefore, exclusion of intermediate days does not apply.

7. Strict compliance with Rule 42 is required by the Supreme Court. Julian v.

State, 440 A.2d 990, 991 (Del. 1982).

8. Prime’s Application was filed 15 days after this Court’s December 18, 2023

ruling.

THEREFORE, the Court finds that Prime Insurance Company’s Application for

Certification of Interlocutory Appeal is hereby DENIED AS UNTIMELY. The

Court further finds that Prime has failed to demonstrate good cause for its untimely

filing.

SO ORDERED

Mary M. Johnston Judge Mary M. Johnston

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Julian v. State
440 A.2d 990 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cordova v. Kiage, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cordova-v-kiage-delsuperct-2024.