Cordova (Jose) Vs. State

479 P.3d 225
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided January 22, 2021·No. 82281·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOSE LUIS CORDOVA, A/K/A MARIO No. 82281 RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant, FILED vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, JAN 2 2 2021 Res s ondent. ELEZ4BET A. BROWN CLE •F S REME COURT

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for appointment of attorney. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for appointment of attorney, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

1

:11)ta rrawm.17I* Parraguirre

J

Stiglich Silver

cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court Jose Luis Cordova Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

40) 1947A asato

4-1.245a:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cordova (Jose) Vs. State, 479 P.3d 225 (Neb. 2021).

479 P.3d 225 (Cordova (Jose) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)