Cordosa v. State

45 S.W.2d 587, 119 Tex. Crim. 398, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 95
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 20, 1932
DocketNo. 14757
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 45 S.W.2d 587 (Cordosa v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cordosa v. State, 45 S.W.2d 587, 119 Tex. Crim. 398, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 95 (Tex. 1932).

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for murder; punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

The record is here without any bills of exception. No exceptions were taken to the charge of the court.

The evidence is in condition of direct conflict, the witnesses for the state testifying that but one shot was fired and that by appellant, who shot and killed deceased. The defense witnesses, including appellant, testified that two shots were fired, and that deceased fired first. The jury are the exclusive judges of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given their testimony, under our statute. They having accepted as true the testimony of the state witnesses, and there being evidence before them sufficient to support the verdict, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. State
821 S.W.2d 616 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Brooks v. State
548 S.W.2d 680 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 S.W.2d 587, 119 Tex. Crim. 398, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cordosa-v-state-texcrimapp-1932.