Cordon v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America

123 F.2d 363, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2711
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 9, 1941·No. Nos. 8662, 8663·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In an appeal from a declaratory judgment declaring that a policy insuring the owner of premises against liability im[364] posed by law on account of bodily injuries accidentally suffered thereon does not insure against an assault willfully committed by the owner’s employee, it is the view of the court that the issue is controlled by the decisions of the Ohio Supreme Court in Commonwealth Casualty Co. v. Headers, 118 Ohio St. 429, 161 N.E. 278, and Rothman et al. v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co., 134 Ohio St. 241, 16 N.E.2d 417, 117 A.L.R. 1169, wherein the principle is announced that: “The state of the will of the person by whose agency an injury is caused, rather than that of the injured person, determines whether an injury is accidental.”

Wherefore, it is hereby ordered that the judgment below be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cordon v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America, 123 F.2d 363, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2711 (6th Cir. 1941).

123 F.2d 363 (Cordon v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murray v. Landenberger
215 N.E.2d 412 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1966)
Huntington Cab Co. v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.
63 F. Supp. 939 (S.D. West Virginia, 1945)
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Jones
45 F. Supp. 887 (E.D. Michigan, 1942)