Cordon v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cordon v. Chase Manhattan Bank

37 A.D.2d 931, 325 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3063

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 4, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 931 (Cordon v. Chase Manhattan Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cordon v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 37 A.D.2d 931, 325 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3063 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 28, 1970, after a trial, unanimously reversed on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and vacated, and the complaint dismissed. Plaintiff did not establish actionable negligence on the part of .the defendant bank in the application of the wax or the maintenance of the floor. Nor did the plaintiff show that defendant bank had prior notice or should have known of the alleged dangerous condition created by the cleaning of the floor by the original third-party defendant pursuant to an employment contract. (Silva v. American Irving Sav. Bank, 31 A D 2d 620, affd. without opinion, 26 N Y 2d 727.) Concur — Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, Nunez, Kupferman and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 28, 1970, after a trial, unanimously reversed on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and vacated, and the complaint dismissed. Plaintiff did not establish actionable negligence on the part of .the defendant bank in the application of the wax or the maintenance of the floor. Nor did the plaintiff show that defendant bank had prior notice or should have known of the alleged dangerous condition created by the cleaning of the floor by the original third-party defendant pursuant to an employment contract. (Silva v. American Irving Sav. Bank, 31 A D 2d 620, affd. without opinion, 26 N Y 2d 727.) Concur — Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, Nunez, Kupferman and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 931, 325 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cordon-v-chase-manhattan-bank-nyappdiv-1971.