Cordon v. 698 Realty, L. L. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cordon v. 698 Realty, L. L. C.

288 A.D.2d 45, 732 N.Y.S.2d 564, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10386

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 288 A.D.2d 45 (Cordon v. 698 Realty, L. L. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cordon v. 698 Realty, L. L. C., 288 A.D.2d 45, 732 N.Y.S.2d 564, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10386 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Tingling, J.), entered March 1, 2001, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to file a second amended complaint and a third supplemental complaint and granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs’ claims for negligence, retaliatory eviction, assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress were properly found to be precluded under the doctrines of collateral estoppel and res judicata in light of prior litigation adversely determinative of such claims (see, D'Arata v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 76 NY2d 659; Matter of Reilly v Reid, 45 NY2d 24).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Williams, J. P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Tingling, J.), entered March 1, 2001, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to file a second amended complaint and a third supplemental complaint and granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs’ claims for negligence, retaliatory eviction, assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress were properly found to be precluded under the doctrines of collateral estoppel and res judicata in light of prior litigation adversely determinative of such claims (see, D'Arata v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 76 NY2d 659; Matter of Reilly v Reid, 45 NY2d 24).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Williams, J. P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 A.D.2d 45, 732 N.Y.S.2d 564, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cordon-v-698-realty-l-l-c-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack