Cordner v. Myers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cordner v. Myers

282 A.D. 729, 122 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4812

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 729 (Cordner v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cordner v. Myers, 282 A.D. 729, 122 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, the owner appeals from a judgment in favor of the contractor for the balance due for labor and materials furnished in repairing a boiler upon the order of the lessee. The lease provided that the owner was to repair same; and it was undisputed that he told the lessee to have respondent do some work on the boiler at his (the owner’s) expense, that he saw some of respondent’s men at work, without objection, that he subsequently permitted the lessee to deduct the entire charge from the rent, and that the contractor was not paid therefor. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, the owner appeals from a judgment in favor of the contractor for the balance due for labor and materials furnished in repairing a boiler upon the order of the lessee. The lease provided that the owner was to repair same; and it was undisputed that he told the lessee to have respondent do some work on the boiler at his (the owner’s) expense, that he saw some of respondent’s men at work, without objection, that he subsequently permitted the lessee to deduct the entire charge from the rent, and that the contractor was not paid therefor. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 729, 122 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cordner-v-myers-nyappdiv-1953.