Cordis Corp. v. Kappos

Federal Circuit

Cordis Corp. v. Kappos

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 30, 2012

Docket2012-1039

StatusUnpublished

This text of Cordis Corp. v. Kappos (Cordis Corp. v. Kappos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cordis Corp. v. Kappos, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit CORDIS CORPORATION, Plain,tiff-Appellant, V. DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE AND UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Defendo:n,ts-Appellees, _ AND _ ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Defendant-Appellee. 2012-1039 Appeal from the United States District C0urt for the Eastern District of Virginia in case n0. 11-CV-0127, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee. ON MOTION 0 R D E R C0rdis C0rporati0n moves to withdraw its appeal Up0n consideration thereof

coR1)Is c0RP v. KAPPos IT ls ORDERE:D THAT: 2 (1) The motion to withdraw the appeal is granted The appeal is dismissed (2) Each side shall bear its own costs JAN 3 0 2012 Date cc: John F. Duffy, Esq. FOR THE COURT /sf J an H0rba1y Jan H0rba1y FlLED clerk u.s. counTm=A1=PEAisF0a ms renew concun‘ Mi¢hae1A. M@rin, ESq. JAN 3 0 2012 Bernard G. Kim, Esq. JAN HOHBALY 321 t clean Issued As A Mandate: 3 0 _

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit CORDIS CORPORATION, Plain,tiff-Appellant, V. DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE AND UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Defendo:n,ts-Appellees, _ AND _ ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Defendant-Appellee. 2012-1039 Appeal from the United States District C0urt for the Eastern District of Virginia in case n0. 11-CV-0127, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee. ON MOTION 0 R D E R C0rdis C0rporati0n moves to withdraw its appeal Up0n consideration thereof

coR1)Is c0RP v. KAPPos IT ls ORDERE:D THAT: 2 (1) The motion to withdraw the appeal is granted The appeal is dismissed (2) Each side shall bear its own costs JAN 3 0 2012 Date cc: John F. Duffy, Esq. FOR THE COURT /sf J an H0rba1y Jan H0rba1y FlLED clerk u.s. counTm=A1=PEAisF0a ms renew concun‘ Mi¢hae1A. M@rin, ESq. JAN 3 0 2012 Bernard G. Kim, Esq. JAN HOHBALY 321 t clean Issued As A Mandate: 3 0 _

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Cordis Corp. v. Kappos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cordis-corp-v-kappos-cafc-2012.