Cordes v. Torrisi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cordes v. Torrisi

109 A.D.2d 813, 486 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47322

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 18, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 109 A.D.2d 813 (Cordes v. Torrisi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cordes v. Torrisi, 109 A.D.2d 813, 486 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47322 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.), entered December 12, 1983, in defendant’s favor, upon a jury verdict.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

[814]*814Plaintiffs were injured in a collision when defendant’s automobile went out of control, allegedly because the steering mechanism malfunctioned. The trial court charged the emergency doctrine, over objection, in accordance with 1 PJI 2:14. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant.

Under the circumstances, the emergency charge was properly given (Liability of owner or operator of motor vehicle for accident resulting from alleged breaking of or defect in steering mechanism, Ann., 23 ALR2d 539, 548-549), and the issues were properly submitted to the jury for its resolution (3 Encyclopedia NY Law, Automobiles § 2124). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.), entered December 12, 1983, in defendant’s favor, upon a jury verdict.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

[814]*814Plaintiffs were injured in a collision when defendant’s automobile went out of control, allegedly because the steering mechanism malfunctioned. The trial court charged the emergency doctrine, over objection, in accordance with 1 PJI 2:14. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant.

Under the circumstances, the emergency charge was properly given (Liability of owner or operator of motor vehicle for accident resulting from alleged breaking of or defect in steering mechanism, Ann., 23 ALR2d 539, 548-549), and the issues were properly submitted to the jury for its resolution (3 Encyclopedia NY Law, Automobiles § 2124). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A.D.2d 813, 486 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cordes-v-torrisi-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack