Cordero v. State

380 So. 2d 548, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23615
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 1980·No. No. 79-1754·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and order of the trial court. However, we agree with appellant that the phrase “at hard labor” in his sentence is improper. Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Accordingly, we remand this case in order for the trial judge to correct the sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.

GRIMES, C. J., and RYDER and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cordero v. State, 380 So. 2d 548, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23615 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

380 So. 2d 548 (Cordero v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holden v. State
380 So. 2d 548 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)