CORDERO v. KIJAKAZI
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LORRAINE CORDERO, : Plaintiff, : : v. : NO. 20-CV-01868-RAL : KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting : Commissioner of Social Security, : Defendant. O R D E R AND NOW this 31st day of March, 2022, upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Request for Review (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Acting Commissioner of Social Security for an award of benefits, consistent with the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously with this Order; 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED by separate document, filed contemporaneously. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 303 (1993); Kadelski v. Sullivan, 30 F.3d 399, 402 (3d Cir. 1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). 3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes including statistics.
_s/ Richard A. Lloret ________ HON. RICHARD A. LLORET United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
CORDERO v. KIJAKAZI (CORDERO v. KIJAKAZI) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.