Cordero v. City of Columbia
This text of 543 F. App'x 334 (Cordero v. City of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Johnnie Cordero appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Cordero’s complaint alleging violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cordero v. City of Columbia, No. 3:11-cv-02502-JFA, 2013 WL 1282061 (D.S.C. Mar. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
543 F. App'x 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cordero-v-city-of-columbia-ca4-2013.