Corder v. Orlando Fire Associates
This text of 501 So. 2d 634 (Corder v. Orlando Fire Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The summary judgment entered in this case is reversed, as appellant presented sufficient evidence below to raise a material factual issue. Additionally, upon remand it should be noted by the parties that this is not a case where the impact rule would be applicable, but rather one of an owner’s liability for an intentional tort committed by a third party on its property. See Allen v. Babrab, Inc., 438 So.2d 356 (Fla.1983); Stevens v. Jefferson, 436 So.2d 33 (Fla.1983); Orlando Executive Park Inc. v. Robbins, 433 So.2d 491 (Fla.1983).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
501 So. 2d 634, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corder-v-orlando-fire-associates-fladistctapp-1986.