Corden v. Schur Realty Co.

11 A.D.3d 363, 784 N.Y.S.2d 486, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12364

This text of 11 A.D.3d 363 (Corden v. Schur Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Corden v. Schur Realty Co., 11 A.D.3d 363, 784 N.Y.S.2d 486, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

[364]*364Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered on or about October 20, 2003, which granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motions were properly granted given no evidence that the elevator in question had ever previously or subsequently malfunctioned, and an expert’s affidavit in opposition that is pure speculation concerning the cause of the alleged malfunction (see Rodriguez v Davis Equip. Corp., 235 AD2d 222 [1997]). We have considered and rejected plaintiffs’ other claims. Concur—Tom, J.P., Williams, Friedman, Marlow and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodriguez v. Davis Equipment Corp.
235 A.D.2d 222 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.3d 363, 784 N.Y.S.2d 486, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corden-v-schur-realty-co-nyappdiv-2004.