Cordell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cordell v. State

111 S.E. 701, 28 Ga. App. 472, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 617

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 11, 1922

Docket13315

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 111 S.E. 701 (Cordell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cordell v. State, 111 S.E. 701, 28 Ga. App. 472, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 617 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. A ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial complains that the court propounded a certain question to a witness and permitted the witness to answer it. However, it is stated in this ground that no objection was made to the admission of this testimony. The ground therefore raises no question for the consideration of this court.

2. The alleged newly discovered evidence is merely cumulative and impeaching in its character, and the court did not err in overruling the special ground of the motion for a new trial based thereon.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI