Cordele Grocery Co. v. Thigpen

62 S.E. 97, 4 Ga. App. 643, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 498
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 31, 1908·No. 1218·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Powell, J.

This case is controlled by Cloud v. Scarborough, 3 Ga. App. 7 (59 S. E. 202). Where a mortgage on the property oí the principal debtor is taken simultaneously with the creation of the suretyship, the creditor owes to the surety the duty of having it properly probated and recorded within a reasonable time, and a failure to do this relieves the surety. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cordele Grocery Co. v. Thigpen, 62 S.E. 97, 4 Ga. App. 643, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 498 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

62 S.E. 97 (Cordele Grocery Co. v. Thigpen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cheshire v. Hightower
127 S.E. 891 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Bacon v. Hanesley
90 S.E. 1033 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)