Cordele Grocery Co. v. Thigpen
62 S.E. 97, 4 Ga. App. 643, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 498
This text of 62 S.E. 97 (Cordele Grocery Co. v. Thigpen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cordele Grocery Co. v. Thigpen, 62 S.E. 97, 4 Ga. App. 643, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 498 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).
Opinion
This case is controlled by Cloud v. Scarborough, 3 Ga. App. 7 (59 S. E. 202). Where a mortgage on the property oí the principal debtor is taken simultaneously with the creation of the suretyship, the creditor owes to the surety the duty of having it properly probated and recorded within a reasonable time, and a failure to do this relieves the surety. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cheshire v. Hightower
127 S.E. 891 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Bacon v. Hanesley
90 S.E. 1033 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
62 S.E. 97, 4 Ga. App. 643, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cordele-grocery-co-v-thigpen-gactapp-1908.