Cordaro v. Union Free School District No. 22
14 A.D.2d 804, 220 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8414
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 23, 1961·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Plaintiffs failed to make out a prima facie case. Under the circumstances, requirement of more specific supervision than that actually provided, would be unreasonable (cf. Miller v. Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1, 249 App. Div. 738). In our opinion, there was no competent proof adduced that the apparatus was unsuitable for children of plaintiff’s age; nor may that fact be inferred solely from the size
[805] of the apparatus. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cordaro v. Union Free School District No. 22, 14 A.D.2d 804, 220 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8414 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).
14 A.D.2d 804 (Cordaro v. Union Free School District No. 22) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eldridge v. Long Beach City School District
255 A.D.2d 548 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Connett Ex Rel. Connett v. Fremont County School District No. 6
581 P.2d 1097 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1978)