Cord v. State

478 So. 2d 1191, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2633, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17072
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 29, 1985
DocketNo. 85-71
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 478 So. 2d 1191 (Cord v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cord v. State, 478 So. 2d 1191, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2633, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17072 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

To justify imposing a sentence departing from the recommended guideline range the trial judge assigned some valid (permissible) and some invalid (impermissible) reasons. We vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. See Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985); Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218 (Fla.1985).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keen v. State
481 So. 2d 1274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
State v. Mihocik
480 So. 2d 711 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
478 So. 2d 1191, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2633, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cord-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.