Cord v. State
478 So. 2d 1191, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2633, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17072
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 1985·No. No. 85-71·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
To justify imposing a sentence departing from the recommended guideline range the trial judge assigned some valid (permissible) and some invalid (impermissible) reasons. We vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. See Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985); Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218 (Fla.1985).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cord v. State, 478 So. 2d 1191, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2633, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17072 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
478 So. 2d 1191 (Cord v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Keen v. State
481 So. 2d 1274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
State v. Mihocik
480 So. 2d 711 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)