Corcoran v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
58 N.E. 1092, 164 N.Y. 587, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 984
Opinion
*588 Judgment affirmed, with costs. The question whether the statute is violative of the provisions of the Constitution has not been considered for the reason that the question was not raised in the courts below (Purdy v. Erie R. R. Co., 162 N. Y. 42); no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corcoran v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 58 N.E. 1092, 164 N.Y. 587, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 984 (N.Y. 1900).
58 N.E. 1092 (Corcoran v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Purdy v. . Erie R.R. Co.
56 N.E. 508 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)