Corcoran v. Corcoran & Brady, P. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corcoran v. Corcoran & Brady, P. C.

162 A.D.2d 292

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.D.2d 292 (Corcoran v. Corcoran & Brady, P. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corcoran v. Corcoran & Brady, P. C., 162 A.D.2d 292 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment (denominated an order) of the Supreme Court, New York County (Burton Sherman, J.), entered on or about April 12, 1989, which dismissed the petition on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Petitioner’s remedy, if any, is the commencement of an appropriate action in the courts of the State of New Jersey where the original probate proceedings relating to his mother’s and father’s estates were held. The courts of this State do not constitute a proper forum in which to obtain the relief petitioner seeks. Concur—Ross, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment (denominated an order) of the Supreme Court, New York County (Burton Sherman, J.), entered on or about April 12, 1989, which dismissed the petition on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Petitioner’s remedy, if any, is the commencement of an appropriate action in the courts of the State of New Jersey where the original probate proceedings relating to his mother’s and father’s estates were held. The courts of this State do not constitute a proper forum in which to obtain the relief petitioner seeks. Concur—Ross, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 A.D.2d 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corcoran-v-corcoran-brady-p-c-nyappdiv-1990.