Corcoran v. Concord & M. R.

First Circuit

Corcoran v. Concord & M. R.

56 F. 1014, 6 C.C.A. 231, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2143

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided July 1, 1893·No. No. 52·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court is of the opinion that plaintiff should have offered some evidence showing- the scope of the alleged brakeman’s authority. He failed, to do so, and for that reason it is ordered: Judgment of circuit court affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corcoran v. Concord & M. R., 56 F. 1014, 6 C.C.A. 231, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2143 (1st Cir. 1893).

Pincite

56 F. 1014 (Corcoran v. Concord & M. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related