Corcoran & Kostelanetz v. Dupuy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corcoran & Kostelanetz v. Dupuy

6 A.D.2d 776, 175 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5608

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 A.D.2d 776 (Corcoran & Kostelanetz v. Dupuy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corcoran & Kostelanetz v. Dupuy, 6 A.D.2d 776, 175 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5608 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. No opinion. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. No opinion. Defendant Gladys De Polignac appeals from an order denying her application to vacate the warrant of attachment and all levies thereunder pursuant to section 918 of the Civil Practice Act, unless plaintiffs consent to the dismissal as against her of the fifth cause of action stated in the second amended complaint, and for other relief. The order denying the motion for vacatur is modified to the extent of granting the motion to vacate the warrant of attachment and all levies thereunder unless the plaintiffs stipulate to sever and discontinue the fifth cause of action as to said defendant. The fifth cause of action does not set forth facts from which it may be ascertained with reasonable certainty that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover a stated sum. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 903; Prentiss v. Greene, 193 App. Div. 672, 679.) The order is otherwise affirmed, without costs. Settle order. Concur —Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. No opinion. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. No opinion. Defendant Gladys De Polignac appeals from an order denying her application to vacate the warrant of attachment and all levies thereunder pursuant to section 918 of the Civil Practice Act, unless plaintiffs consent to the dismissal as against her of the fifth cause of action stated in the second amended complaint, and for other relief. The order denying the motion for vacatur is modified to the extent of granting the motion to vacate the warrant of attachment and all levies thereunder unless the plaintiffs stipulate to sever and discontinue the fifth cause of action as to said defendant. The fifth cause of action does not set forth facts from which it may be ascertained with reasonable certainty that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover a stated sum. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 903; Prentiss v. Greene, 193 App. Div. 672, 679.) The order is otherwise affirmed, without costs. Settle order. Concur —Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 776, 175 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corcoran-kostelanetz-v-dupuy-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack