Corcel Corporation, Inc. v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Corcel Corporation, Inc. v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 551 F. App'x 571
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 30, 2017·No. 15-15315·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 15-15315 Date Filed: 01/30/2017 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________

No. 15-15315 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 9:12-cv-80896-DPG

CORCEL CORPORATION, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC., A Virginia Corporation, LINE-TEC, INC., A Florida Corporation, AKA SERVICES, INC., A Florida Corporation,

Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________

(January 30, 2017) Case: 15-15315 Date Filed: 01/30/2017 Page: 2 of 2

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After review and careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record,

we affirm the district court’s order granting Defendants-Appellees’ motions for

summary judgment, which concluded that the statute of limitations barred Plaintiff-

Appellant’s civil Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act claims, 18

U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968. The parties are already familiar with the facts and

procedural history, and we affirm for the reasons outlined in the district court’s

thorough and well-reasoned order dated March 8, 2016.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corcel Corporation, Inc. v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc., (11th Cir. 2017).

Corcel Corporation, Inc. v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. (Corcel Corporation, Inc. v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 1961-1968
18 U.S.C. § 1961-1968
§ 1961
18 U.S.C. § 1961