Corcel Corp. v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Corcel Corp. v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.

674 F. App'x 972

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 30, 2017·No. No. 15-15315 Non-Argument Calendar·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After review and careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record, we affirm the district court’s order granting Defendants-Appellees’ motions for summary judgment, which concluded that the statute of limitations barred Plaintiff-Appellant’s civil Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act claims, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968. The parties are already familiar with the facts and procedural history, and we •affirm for the reasons outlined in the district court’s thorough and well-reasoned order dated March 8, 2016.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After review and careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record, we affirm the district court’s order granting Defendants-Appellees’ motions for summary judgment, which concluded that the statute of limitations barred Plaintiff-Appellant’s civil Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act claims, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968. The parties are already familiar with the facts and procedural history, and we •affirm for the reasons outlined in the district court’s thorough and well-reasoned order dated March 8, 2016.

AFFIRMED.

Corcel Corp. v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc., 674 F. App'x 972 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

674 F. App'x 972 (Corcel Corp. v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related