Corbo v. Strickland
538 So. 2d 960, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 509, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 795, 1989 WL 13086
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 1989·No. No. 88-1584·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
It was error not to require the wife to return to the husband a set of china which constituted his separate property and which he had brought into the marriage. See Gardner v. Gardner, 452 So.2d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). In all other respects, the property distribution was equitable. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corbo v. Strickland, 538 So. 2d 960, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 509, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 795, 1989 WL 13086 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
538 So. 2d 960 (Corbo v. Strickland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mathews v. Mathews
558 So. 2d 210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)