Corbo v. Strickland
This text of 538 So. 2d 960 (Corbo v. Strickland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was error not to require the wife to return to the husband a set of china which constituted his separate property and which he had brought into the marriage. See Gardner v. Gardner, 452 So.2d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). In all other respects, the property distribution was equitable. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
538 So. 2d 960, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 509, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 795, 1989 WL 13086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corbo-v-strickland-fladistctapp-1989.