Corbly v. Wright

199 S.E. 168, 186 Ga. 782, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 710
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 28, 1938
DocketNos. 12476, 12477
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 199 S.E. 168 (Corbly v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Corbly v. Wright, 199 S.E. 168, 186 Ga. 782, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 710 (Ga. 1938).

Opinion

Gbice, Justice.

1. That part of the judgment excepted to which dissolved the temporary restraining order theretofore granted is not reviewable by a fast writ of error. Johnson v. Troup County Rural Electrification Corporation, 184 Ga. 527 (192 S. E. 15), and cit.

2. Where at interlocutory hearing the judge was authorized to find, from the pleadings and proofs submitted, that the holder of a security deed was seeking, long after its maturity, to exercise the power of sale thereunder; that the contemplated sale was restrained, on an ex parte application at the instance of the debtor, on allegations of fact which at the hearing were found to be unsupported by the evidence; that the original indebtedness of $5500 contracted on July 14, 1927, had, after crediting all payments made thereon, grown to $9160.40; that, contrary to the covenant of the grantor to pay all taxes and insurance premiums on the property, he had failed to do so, the holder having had to pay three years taxes and insurance premiums; that the taxes for the year 1937 were outstanding and unpaid; that the value of the property included in the security deed was only $3500; that there were unsatisfied judgments against the grantor; that he was insolvent; that he was in possession of the property, receiving and disposing of the rents and profits therefrom; and that the property was deteriorating in value, — it was not an abuse of discretion to appoint a receiver to take charge of the property. Compare Crockett v. Wilson, 184 Ga. 539 (192 S. E. 19), and cit.

3. The cross-bill of exceptions, assigning error on the order of the judge granting a supersedeas, presents for decision a moot question.

Judgment ajjb-med on the main hill of exceptions.

Cross-hill dismissed. All the Justices concur. S. W. Fa/riss, for Corbly. F. M. Gleason, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Pine Hill Apartments, Inc.
261 F.2d 667 (Fifth Circuit, 1958)
Pope v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
20 S.E.2d 13 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 S.E. 168, 186 Ga. 782, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corbly-v-wright-ga-1938.