Corbitt v. State
150 S.E. 442, 40 Ga. App. 554, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 645
This text of 150 S.E. 442 (Corbitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Corbitt v. State, 150 S.E. 442, 40 Ga. App. 554, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 645 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).
Opinion
1. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are not referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and, therefore, are treated as abandoned.
2. The verdict Was authorized by the evidence and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
150 S.E. 442, 40 Ga. App. 554, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corbitt-v-state-gactapp-1929.