Corbitt v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

611 F.3d 1379, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15351, 109 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1600, 2010 WL 2900384
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 27, 2010·No. 08-12199·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

On July 19, 2010, the parties in the above-entitled appeal, filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal with Prejudice. Upon consideration of those matters contained in the parties’ joint motion, and for good cause shown, it is ORDERED that said motion be and the same is hereby GRANTED. The panel opinion, published in 589 F.3d 1136, had already been vacated by our order granting rehearing en banc. Corbitt v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 598 F.3d 1259, 1259 (11th Cir.2010) (en banc). The judgment of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions that the case be dismissed. See Key Enterprises of Delaware, Inc. v. Venice Hospital, 9 F.3d 893, 894 & 898-99 (11th Cir.1993) (en banc) (per curiam). Each party is to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees, subject to any separate agreement by the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corbitt v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 611 F.3d 1379, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15351, 109 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1600, 2010 WL 2900384 (11th Cir. 2010).

611 F.3d 1379 (Corbitt v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Livingston v. Marion Bank & Trust Co.
30 F. Supp. 3d 1285 (N.D. Alabama, 2014)
McKinzy v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
836 F. Supp. 2d 1014 (N.D. California, 2011)