Corbisiero v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corbisiero v. Kelly

26 A.D.3d 234, 808 N.Y.S.2d 686

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.3d 234 (Corbisiero v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corbisiero v. Kelly, 26 A.D.3d 234, 808 N.Y.S.2d 686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

[235]*235Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered November 12, 2004, denying the petition seeking to annul respondent Police Commissioner’s denial of an application for reissuance of a carry business handgun license and dismissing this proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The New York Police Department License Division took into consideration petitioner’s seven arrests during the sixteen years prior to his application, and evidence that he handles large sums of money in the form of checks, not cash. On this record, the determination was not arbitrary and capricious, and had a rational basis (Matter of Papaioannou v Kelly, 14 AD3d 459 [2005]).

We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them without merit. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Sullivan, Williams, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[235]*235Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered November 12, 2004, denying the petition seeking to annul respondent Police Commissioner’s denial of an application for reissuance of a carry business handgun license and dismissing this proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The New York Police Department License Division took into consideration petitioner’s seven arrests during the sixteen years prior to his application, and evidence that he handles large sums of money in the form of checks, not cash. On this record, the determination was not arbitrary and capricious, and had a rational basis (Matter of Papaioannou v Kelly, 14 AD3d 459 [2005]).

We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them without merit. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Sullivan, Williams, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.3d 234, 808 N.Y.S.2d 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corbisiero-v-kelly-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack