Corbin v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corbin v. Harris

64 A.D.2d 620, 406 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12401

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 10, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A.D.2d 620 (Corbin v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corbin v. Harris, 64 A.D.2d 620, 406 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12401 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 27, 1977, which (1) "denied” her request for injunctive relief, (2) granted defendants’ counterclaim for possession of the subject [621]*621premises, (3) directed her to vacate the premises, (4) prohibited defendants from using the vacated apartment as a rental unit and (5) directed defendants to convert the premises "into a two (2) family dwelling as required and directed by the Department of Buildings.” Appeal dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. The tenant is out of possession and cannot be legally restored to possession. Martuscello, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur. [92 Mise 2d 480.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 27, 1977, which (1) "denied” her request for injunctive relief, (2) granted defendants’ counterclaim for possession of the subject [621]*621premises, (3) directed her to vacate the premises, (4) prohibited defendants from using the vacated apartment as a rental unit and (5) directed defendants to convert the premises "into a two (2) family dwelling as required and directed by the Department of Buildings.” Appeal dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. The tenant is out of possession and cannot be legally restored to possession. Martuscello, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur. [92 Mise 2d 480.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A.D.2d 620, 406 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corbin-v-harris-nyappdiv-1978.