Corbin v. Fairbanks, Barlow & Co.
56 Vt. 538
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This contract is not susceptible of the construction contended for by the defendants. It is a contract to do one of three things by a time certain at defendants’ option. That option continued until said time elapsed, after which, and especially after demand of performance by plaintiff and refusal by defendants, it was gone, and defendants became liable to pay in money at plaintiff’s option.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corbin v. Fairbanks, Barlow & Co., 56 Vt. 538 (Vt. 1884).
56 Vt. 538 (Corbin v. Fairbanks, Barlow & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Faulkner
68 F.2d 676 (Tenth Circuit, 1934)
Gaddy v. Smith
116 S.W. 164 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1908)