Corbin v. Bladen County Child Support Agency
This text of 103 F. App'x 758 (Corbin v. Bladen County Child Support Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David R. Corbin appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Corbin v. Bladen County, CA-03-181-H-3 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2003 & Jan. 6, 2004). We deny Ajit Naik’s motion for certificate of service default and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 F. App'x 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corbin-v-bladen-county-child-support-agency-ca4-2004.