Corbett v. State

156 S.W. 206, 70 Tex. Crim. 73, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 220
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Corbett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 63 Tex. Crim. 478
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 16, 1913·No. No. 2413.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged in the recorder’s court with a violation of the city ordinance, and was there fined $25. He prosecuted an appeal to the County Court, in which court upon trial he was again fined $25. From that judgment he prosecutes this appeal.

Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction in this court. This motion is well taken and should be and is sustained. Article 87 of the Bevised Code of Criminal Procedure provides that where the case originates in the justice or recorder’s court or other inferior courts and is appealed to the County Court, and in the latter court the judgment is for one hundred dollars or less, the case shall be final. Some of the eases are collated under article 87 of the Bevised Code. It is not deemed necessary here to cite them.

Motion to dismiss is sustained and the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corbett v. State, 156 S.W. 206, 70 Tex. Crim. 73, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 220 (Tex. 1913).

156 S.W. 206 (Corbett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.