Corbett v. South Carolina

258 U.S. 606, 42 S. Ct. 315, 66 L. Ed. 787, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2311
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 20, 1922
DocketNo. 746
StatusPublished

This text of 258 U.S. 606 (Corbett v. South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Corbett v. South Carolina, 258 U.S. 606, 42 S. Ct. 315, 66 L. Ed. 787, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2311 (1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon.the authority of: (1) Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418, 419; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18, 19. (2) § 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. THE SHIP RESOLUTION, AND INGERSOLL
2 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1781)
Schlosser v. Hemphill
198 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission
226 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works
237 U.S. 413 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Bruce v. Tobin
245 U.S. 18 (Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
258 U.S. 606, 42 S. Ct. 315, 66 L. Ed. 787, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corbett-v-south-carolina-scotus-1922.