Corbett v. South Carolina
This text of 258 U.S. 606 (Corbett v. South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon.the authority of: (1) Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418, 419; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18, 19. (2) § 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 U.S. 606, 42 S. Ct. 315, 66 L. Ed. 787, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corbett-v-south-carolina-scotus-1922.