Corbett v. Purdy

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Corbett v. Purdy

80 F. 901, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 3025

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedMay 17, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 80 F. 901 (Corbett v. Purdy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corbett v. Purdy, 80 F. 901, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 3025 (circtsdny 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The relevant provisions of section 4952, Rev. St. U. S., as amended by the act of March 3, 1891, are as follows:

“Sec. 4952. The author of * * * any dramatic composition * * * shall, upon complying with the provisions of this chapter, have the sole liberty of * * * publicly performing or representing it or causing it to be performed or represented by others,” etc.

There is no evidence to show that defendants are publicly performing or representing complainant’s "dramatic composition.” The [902]*902right secured by the copyright act is the property in the literary composition, and not in the name or title given to it. In no case, so far as this court is advised, has protection been afforded by injunction, under the copyright laws to the title alone, separate from the book or dramatic composition which it is used to designate. Osgood v. Allen, 1 Holmes, 185, Fed. Cas. No. 10,603. Whatever rights complainant may have to restrain appropriation by another of the title of his work, on general principles of equity, cannot be considered in this suit, which is a controversy between citizens of the same state, and presents no federal question. Motion for injunction denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The relevant provisions of section 4952, Rev. St. U. S., as amended by the act of March 3, 1891, are as follows:

“Sec. 4952. The author of * * * any dramatic composition * * * shall, upon complying with the provisions of this chapter, have the sole liberty of * * * publicly performing or representing it or causing it to be performed or represented by others,” etc.

There is no evidence to show that defendants are publicly performing or representing complainant’s "dramatic composition.” The [902]*902right secured by the copyright act is the property in the literary composition, and not in the name or title given to it. In no case, so far as this court is advised, has protection been afforded by injunction, under the copyright laws to the title alone, separate from the book or dramatic composition which it is used to designate. Osgood v. Allen, 1 Holmes, 185, Fed. Cas. No. 10,603. Whatever rights complainant may have to restrain appropriation by another of the title of his work, on general principles of equity, cannot be considered in this suit, which is a controversy between citizens of the same state, and presents no federal question. Motion for injunction denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 F. 901, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 3025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corbett-v-purdy-circtsdny-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack