Corbett v. McDonald

206 So. 2d 407, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 6048
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 18, 1968·No. No. 1907·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to require a circuit judge to reinstate an alternative writ of mandamus. We decline its issuance because:

1. The circuit court did not have jurisdiction to entertain the original petition for writ of mandamus in that such court does not have appellate jurisdiction over the Florida Real Estate Commission. State ex rel. Randall v. Heffernan, Fla. App.1961, 128 So.2d 892; State ex rel. [Florida] Real Estate Commission v. Anderson, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 265.
2. Assuming jurisdiction in the circuit court, petitioner has an adequate remedy by appeal. Crump v. Branning, 1917, 74 Fla. 522, 77 So. 228; Welch v. State ex rel. Johnson, 1923, 84 Fla. [261] 264, 95 So. 751; State ex rel. North St. Lucie River Drainage Dist. v. Kanner, 1943, 152 Fla. 400, 11 So.2d 889.

Mandamus denied.

WALDEN, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corbett v. McDonald, 206 So. 2d 407, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 6048 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

206 So. 2d 407 (Corbett v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newman v. Hornsby
385 So. 2d 1106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Jezek v. Vordemaier
227 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)