Corbett v. Kirby
This text of 8 A.D.2d 850 (Corbett v. Kirby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, and for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from so much of an order granting appellant’s motion for reconsideration, on additional papers, as on reconsideration, adhered to the original decision denying appellants’ application, for a preference pursuant to rule 9 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A.D.2d 850, 191 N.Y.S.2d 139, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corbett-v-kirby-nyappdiv-1959.