Corbett v. Davis
This text of 179 P. 954 (Corbett v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order setting aside the default of respondent for failure to answer. No judgment was entered in the case and a motion to dismiss has beemmade on the ground that the order is not appealable.
The decision of this case is governed by the rule of law to be found in Utah Assn. of Credit Men v. Budge, 16 Ida. 751, 102 Pac. 390, 691, Omaha Structural Steel Co. v. Lemon, 30 Ida. 363, 164 Pac. 1011, and Evans State Bank v. Skeen, 30 Ida. 703, 167 Pac. 1165.
The motion is granted. Costs are awarded to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 P. 954, 32 Idaho 204, 1919 Ida. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corbett-v-davis-idaho-1919.