Corbett v. Davis

179 P. 954, 32 Idaho 204, 1919 Ida. LEXIS 23
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided March 29, 1919·Published

Opinion

MORGAN, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside the default of respondent for failure to answer. No judgment was entered in the case and a motion to dismiss has beemmade on the ground that the order is not appealable.

The decision of this case is governed by the rule of law to be found in Utah Assn. of Credit Men v. Budge, 16 Ida. 751, 102 Pac. 390, 691, Omaha Structural Steel Co. v. Lemon, 30 Ida. 363, 164 Pac. 1011, and Evans State Bank v. Skeen, 30 Ida. 703, 167 Pac. 1165.

The motion is granted. Costs are awarded to respondent.

Rice and Budge, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corbett v. Davis, 179 P. 954, 32 Idaho 204, 1919 Ida. LEXIS 23 (Idaho 1919).

179 P. 954 (Corbett v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Utah Ass'n of Credit Men v. Budge
102 P. 691 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1909)
Omaha Structural Steel Works v. Lemon
164 P. 1011 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1917)
Evans State Bank v. Skeen
167 P. 1165 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1917)