Corbett v. County of Onondaga

291 A.D.2d 886, 738 N.Y.S.2d 621, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1109
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 1, 2002·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from that part of an order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (McCarthy, J.), entered April 27, 2001, that denied defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for injuries sustained by Patrick J. Corbett (plaintiff) [887] when his vehicle was rear-ended by a truck driven by defendant David I. Brown and owned by defendant County of Onondaga. Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint because an issue of fact exists whether plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). It is well established that “conflicting expert opinions may not be resolved on a motion for summary judgment” (Williams v Lucianatelli, 259 AD2d 1003, 1003). Present — Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Burns and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corbett v. County of Onondaga, 291 A.D.2d 886, 738 N.Y.S.2d 621, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1109 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

291 A.D.2d 886 (Corbett v. County of Onondaga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rohr v. Dewald
2018 NY Slip Op 4160 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
COOK, CURTIS v. PETERSON, ALYSSA S.
137 A.D.3d 1594 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Taher v. Valerio-Mena
195 Misc. 2d 687 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2003)
Bieman v. Thurn
295 A.D.2d 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Pittman v. Rickard
295 A.D.2d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)