Corbett v. Adro Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corbett v. Adro Holding Corp.

255 A.D. 821, 7 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5429

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1938·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: As the assignment to the appellant which the plaintiff seeks to set aside Was executed in Erie county and as the convenience of a greater number of the witnesses, considering the action as a whole, will be served by a trial of the action in that county, we conclude that the Special Term properly denied defendant’s motion. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion for change of venue.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: As the assignment to the appellant which the plaintiff seeks to set aside Was executed in Erie county and as the convenience of a greater number of the witnesses, considering the action as a whole, will be served by a trial of the action in that county, we conclude that the Special Term properly denied defendant’s motion. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion for change of venue.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Corbett v. Adro Holding Corp., 255 A.D. 821, 7 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5429 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 821 (Corbett v. Adro Holding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.