Corbett Buggy Co. v. McLamb

108 S.E. 375, 182 N.C. 762, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 326
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 28, 1921·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment which forms the basis of this appeal was rendered at the November Term, 1920, of Harnett Superior Court. The record was not docketed here until 27 August, 1921, long after the term at which the case should have been heard had expired. lienee, the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal must be allowed. S. v. Telfair, 139 N. C., 555.

Notwithstanding the motion to dismiss, we have examined the record and have been unable to find any reason for disturbing the result below. Upon the merits, the case should be affirmed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corbett Buggy Co. v. McLamb, 108 S.E. 375, 182 N.C. 762, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 326 (N.C. 1921).

108 S.E. 375 (Corbett Buggy Co. v. McLamb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pruitt v. . Wood
156 S.E. 126 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
State v. . Ward
113 S.E. 775 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
Rose v. . Rocky Mount
113 S.E. 506 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
State v. . Barksdale
111 S.E. 711 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
State v. . Johnson
110 S.E. 782 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)