Corber v. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
This text of 540 F. App'x 650 (Corber v. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
MEMORANDUM
We conclude that Plaintiffs petition for coordination was not a proposal to try the cases jointly. See Judith Romo, et al. v. Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc., No. 13-80036 (9th Cir. Sept. 24, 2013). We AFFIRM the district court’s order granting Plaintiffs’ motion to remand.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
540 F. App'x 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corber-v-xanodyne-pharmaceuticals-inc-ca9-2013.